qiwi / primitive-storage

Basic storage implementations.
MIT License
5 stars 2 forks source link

Update typedoc-plugin-external-module-name to the latest version 🚀 #53

Closed greenkeeper[bot] closed 4 years ago

greenkeeper[bot] commented 4 years ago

The devDependency typedoc-plugin-external-module-name was updated from 2.2.1 to 3.0.0.

This version is not covered by your current version range.

If you don’t accept this pull request, your project will work just like it did before. However, you might be missing out on a bunch of new features, fixes and/or performance improvements from the dependency update.


Publisher: christopherthielen License: MIT

Release Notes for 3.0.0

3.0.0 (2020-01-16)

Compare typedoc-plugin-external-module-name versions 2.2.1 and 3.0.0

Bug Fixes

  • emptycomment: Remove empty comments on source reflections that are being merged, just in case.. not sure if this is even necessary! (bd9b5cd)
  • typedoc0.16: Some fixes for 0.16.x (WIP) (0089d19)

Features

  • typedoc0.16.4: Support typedoc 0.16.4 (02aa15a)

BREAKING CHANGE

This plugin no longer attempts to work around the two comment problem in order to identify a comment as module documentation. I recommend using the @packageDocumentation annotation going forward. The issue comment states that TypeDoc will continue to support the two comment legacy mechanism.

Before:

/** @module foo */

After:

/** @packageDocumentation @module foo */

or

/** @packageDocumentation @module foo */ /** for typedoc */
Commits

The new version differs by 9 commits.

  • eb9951b 3.0.0
  • e36ae2a chore: Add a barebones DEVELOPING.md with instructions for running the integration tests
  • f2dad45 test: Use a github actions matrix to test typedoc versions
  • 8e36d35 test: add tests for typedoc 0.16.5
  • 02aa15a feat(typedoc0.16.4): Support typedoc 0.16.4
  • 2be99b7 test: Add some tests, update some tests
  • c8a04d4 test: Add some tests, update some tests
  • 0089d19 fix(typedoc0.16): Some fixes for 0.16.x (WIP)
  • bd9b5cd fix(emptycomment): Remove empty comments on source reflections that are being merged, just in case.. not sure if this is even necessary!

See the full diff


FAQ and help There is a collection of [frequently asked questions](https://greenkeeper.io/faq.html). If those don’t help, you can always [ask the humans behind Greenkeeper](https://github.com/greenkeeperio/greenkeeper/issues/new).

Your Greenkeeper bot :palm_tree:

coveralls commented 4 years ago

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 651


Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 542: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 159
Relevant Lines: 166

💛 - Coveralls