Closed brianlow closed 1 year ago
This proposal looks good to me.
Looks great to me, thanks for doing this!
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in the last 90 days. It will be closed in the next 30 days unless it is tagged properly or other activity occurs.
For maintainers: Please label with bug
, in progress
, on hold
, discussion
or to do
to prevent the issue from being re-flagged.
This issue is not stale. I created a PR (#17979) 5 days ago according to the proposal of @brianlow. I'm not sure how the process is now, who needs to review/approve that PR?
a collaborator who has some free time to review it. tldr; just need to be patient now.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in the last 90 days. It will be closed in the next 30 days unless it is tagged properly or other activity occurs.
For maintainers: Please label with bug
, in progress
, on hold
, discussion
or to do
to prevent the issue from being re-flagged.
This issue has been automatically closed because it has not had activity in the last 30 days. If this issue is still valid, re-open the issue and let us know. // [stale-action-closed]
Any progress with that?
Any progress with that?
I'm waiting for PR #16736 being accepted and merged. Than we can continue on restructuring the sofle family.
Reorganize the sofle code so keymaps are specific to hardware variation, all organized under a top level
sofle
folderFeature Request Type
Description
Proposed folder structure:
Background
/keymaps/family/hardware-variant/keymaps
Pros
Happy to make this change but want approval from hardware maintainers. If I don't heard back after a month I'll assume you are no longer maintaining and are ok with the change.