Open stephenmdangelo opened 8 years ago
/cc @akreuzkamp Not sure what would be semantically better here (separate type for aliasdefs or reuse propdefs), I would be fine with any of those, I presume.
@akreuzkamp, what do you think?
@stephenmdangelo Is this still something you want to achieve? This needs changes in runtime, then. Also, could you rebase?
@chalker I... don’t remember... I’ll look into it. I assume I had a usecase for it and either worked around it or maybe made the runtime change on some branch already. I’ll let you know.
This builds off of #19 adding deep-subproperties support to property aliases. I haven't made any corresponding changes to the runtime, but I'll do that if this makes sense.