Closed cboulanger closed 4 years ago
And, as mentioned in the title of the issue, we could then try to reach beta status as soon as possible, to give users a sense of trust that we won't radically alter the compiler before release again.
Should we move the qooxdoo package to 6.0.0-beta too? Releasing the new npm package would be a good oppertunity.
@hkollmann Maybe this should be discussed in a dedicated issue in the qooxdoo repo. In my opinion, we should assign all open issues that need to be addressed before release to https://github.com/qooxdoo/qooxdoo/milestone/65 and then determine if there are issues left that would block beta status.
Updated description to include @johnspackman's suggestion here: https://github.com/qooxdoo/qooxdoo-compiler/pull/380#issuecomment-487479798
regarding the name how if we also went to 6.0.0-beta ?
@oetiker I'd say as long as the compiler is developed outside of the framework code, I'd keep the versions different - since the release cycle is different, it seems to me that visibly different version numbers are better.
(updated June 5th)
Maybe it makes sense to use the move to the scoped NPM packages to also move to a move reliable compiler? From your point of view, are there issues left that need to be addressed before we go into beta?
What about proceeding in this order:
qooxdoo-compiler
with a deprecation notice@qooxdoo/compiler
@qooxdoo/compiler
dependency in the user codeqxl.*
repos