Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Stuart, in the code I can see that [[wikiN:...]] designed to be highlighted as
existent and non-existent, but they are always non-existent.
Should we fix it that way?
Original comment by habamax
on 10 May 2012 at 3:34
I agree that they should not be non-existent. The two other options are:
1. Highlight all of them as existent
2. Scan the filesystem to identify existent versus non-existent
I would go with option 1 for simplicity, however, Tomas would also be a good
person to consult, since he has invested significant effort into the current
highlighting code ...
Original comment by stu.andrews
on 10 May 2012 at 11:18
Original comment by habamax
on 13 May 2012 at 3:35
Hmm, [[wiki0:NonExistentPage]] is highlighted ...
But, the code is simpler now.
Original comment by stu.andrews
on 14 May 2012 at 4:22
Are you sure?
In my environment with maxhi=1 [[wiki0:NonExistentPage]] is highlighted as
existent link.
Original comment by habamax
on 14 May 2012 at 4:36
I have also tried it on windows, and it is ok there too...
Original comment by habamax
on 14 May 2012 at 1:34
I expected that when wikiN was active, [[wikiN:NonExistentPage]] would not be
highlighted since it does not exist!
We are agreed about [[wikiN:NonExistentPage]] being highlighted when wikiN is
**not active**. I guess the question I was raising is whether or not
conditional highlighting should be applied for [[wikiN:...]] when wikiN **is
active**.
This usage is not common, so I would be happy to keep the current behavior,
perhaps with a note in the docs/code.
Thoughts?
Original comment by stu.andrews
on 14 May 2012 at 1:59
I think we shouldn't bother with highlighting current 'wikiN:' links.
Let us keep current behaviour.
Original comment by habamax
on 14 May 2012 at 2:08
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
habamax
on 10 May 2012 at 5:36