Closed b5 closed 4 years ago
@Arqu, apologies, this PR erroneously includes a copy of the push/pull RFC, if I understand correctly, I think your comments about retention strategies apply to that RFC more than the storage one:
I hate to say it but it might even warant a separate RFC for just the retention strategies and network health, split of from storage, accept policies/params and storage commands.
Totally agreed. Might not have made this clear enough, but I'm hoping these RFCs just set the stage for work on defining retention strategies, and the strategies themselves should be described in future RFCs. The one retention strategy we do need right now is the none
strategy, which when the storage max value is exceeded. In this "no strategy" case we need these storage
commands to manually request a remote drop versions until we're under the limit again
Ratified! Thanks all
RFC to support push/pull with storage manipulation commands. Early comments welcome!