@michaelhkay You suggested that content might be a better name – rather than item – for retrieving the sequence-concatenation of values in map lookups in https://github.com/qt4cg/qtspecs/issues/1169#issuecomment-2074378446. Should we rename the functions to array:contents, map:contents or use array:items and map:items?
"content" does seem a better name than "values". The current name "values" suggests that it simply returns the values that are already present, without any hint of a flattening operation.
Triggered by #1087:
map:values
witharray:values
@michaelhkay You suggested that
content
might be a better name – rather thanitem
– for retrieving the sequence-concatenation of values in map lookups in https://github.com/qt4cg/qtspecs/issues/1169#issuecomment-2074378446. Should we rename the functions toarray:contents
,map:contents
or usearray:items
andmap:items
?