Closed najibveto closed 8 months ago
Howdy! the problem must be fixed at the source of the problem: too many filtered reads. One way of course is just lowering the threshold to allow an aggressive filtering, but in this case 4% of the totals looks worth investigating and maybe adjusting the parameters (truncQ, maxee, trunc...) to have less reads filtered in the first place. Different providers or sequencing core can have very different output: once you can tune some parameters based on your usual supplier, you should be able to adjust the pipeline quickly.
A way to investigate the biggest loss is checking the dada2-stats file where you'll see the number of reads retained at each step. Can you please post it?
thank you for your reply. the dada2-stats file is a follow: <html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
Ā | input | filtered | denoised | merged | non-chimeric -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- W2111_R1.fastq.gz | 71411 | 19455 | 19455 | 13308 | 2653 W2201_R1.fastq.gz | 76186 | 23861 | 23861 | 20669 | 2085 W2202_R1.fastq.gz | 69819 | 25303 | 25303 | 21829 | 2245 W2203_R1.fastq.gz | 91891 | 46711 | 46711 | 34512 | 6685
Describe the bug hello, sorry to disturb you again. I tried the dadaist2 on my data after i cleaned it using trimmomatic tool. first i checked the data using seqfu:
then i made the metadata using the command dadaist2-metadata:
I run it as usual:
as u can see, there was DADA2 error and the tool didn't generate MicrobiomeAnalyst files. how is it possible to fix it, so i can get the files for microbiomeanalyst and then makde the phyloseq object? thank you and sorry for the trouble again.