Suggestions: Include BugSeq in Benchmarks

quadram-institute-bioscience / nanopore-reads-classification

Benchmark of Oxford Nanopore raw reads taxonomic classification using different approaches

GNU General Public License v3.0

0 stars 0 forks source link

Suggestions: Include BugSeq in Benchmarks #1

Open schorlton opened 3 years ago

schorlton commented 3 years ago

Hi! Great initiative. I recognize you state in your README that you're looking for open source tools, but I'd highly suggest you include BugSeq in your benchmarks. In the linked publication and external evaluations, BugSeq has consistently outperformed Centrifuge/WIMP, MetaMaps, CDKAM and other long read metagenomic classifiers. Get in touch with me if you want to coordinate a benchmark!

telatin commented 3 years ago

Thanks, atm I'm focusing on OS tools but will definitely get in touch