qualintitative / egoweb

This is a repository for EgoWeb 2.0 created and maintained by David P. Kennedy, a researcher at the non-profit RAND Corporation. The repository is also maintained by David Zhang a research programmer at RAND. EgoWeb is a modification of the software EgoNet, which was developed by Chris McCarty at the University of Florida.
http://www.qualintitative.com/wiki/doku.php/egoweb_2.0_home
30 stars 8 forks source link

"Error 404 The system is unable to find the requested action "1"." in interview when hitting next on EgoID page #17

Open koenpe opened 7 years ago

koenpe commented 7 years ago

Hi,

I have been trying to put a new copy of Egoweb on to a new domain. I was succesful in going through all the steps you describe in your wiki (very helpful btw). However after getting egoweb to run (adding a user and authoring a study) I will get a consistent error during an interview.

After pressing 'next' on the Ego_ID questions (which show up fine) I get the following error: "Error 404 The system is unable to find the requested action "1"."

I have tried to clear and import the database file. I have tried copying a working copy of egoweb (from another domain) to the new site. The error remains.

I am not familiar with the framework so I was wondering whether you could point me in the direction of the cause.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

The url of the EgoID page says: "http://www.example.org/interview/1#/page/1"

The url after hitting 'next' says: "http://www.example.org/interview/1/5#/page/2

If I create a second study on the same domain I get the same error message. However, it will count up. So the error for the first study will read: "Error 404 The system is unable to find the requested action "1"." The error message for the second study will read: "Error 404 The system is unable to find the requested action "2"."

Does the number of the requested action refer to the Study ID perhaps?

Should I start a new thread regarding this issue?

qualintitative commented 7 years ago

Thanks for starting a new thread. yes I think that first number 1 is the study number. I was thinking it was a problem with the page number, so at least we have identified that it is something to do with the study number. @zhangster do you have any ideas?