Closed jensstalder closed 2 years ago
<buy>
to behave the same? (Is in the pr)<rent>
, and still avoiding the cos-nonambig-fix
problem.
- [ ] Should we also adjust
<buy>
to behave the same? (Is in the pr)
IMO i'd say yes. Would be good be consistent.
- [ ] Is this considered breaking? Or even just a patch?
Strictly speaking this is a breaking change.
This will fix the co-non ambiguous issue, but it will allow
<rent>
tag to be empty. Wich differs from<buy>
. I did not find a good way to test for that. The previous change did work by using<sequences>
as a work-around but caused the co-non ambiguous issue for some validators.Either we allow for that discrepancy, (The XSD would look a bit nicer). Or we need to find some way of making the xmls fail that include empty
<rend>
tags. And for that matter should we also allow it for<buy>
to be more consistent?There is an unwritten rule that goes something like this:
Here it's just a bit difficult to manage since there is a wrapping
<prices>
tag already (which can be omitted).Needs to be merged first
206
Relates to
204