Closed gvx closed 9 years ago
I still would prefer the "anti-pattern" version, but at least now both code snippets are functionally equivalent.
(Before, in the latter example (x, y, z) == (4, -2, 3).)
(x, y, z) == (4, -2, 3)
thanks @gvx! There was another PR with a more concise example, so we took out the original one entirely. Feel free to have a look at it and comment / make modifications!
I still would prefer the "anti-pattern" version, but at least now both code snippets are functionally equivalent.
(Before, in the latter example
(x, y, z) == (4, -2, 3)
.)