Closed mmcewen-g closed 7 months ago
Seems reasonable. Another step towards adding all variations of XCYSWAP .
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024, 6:28 a.m. Matthew McEwen @.***> wrote:
This should be easy to do, and makes reasoning about ISWAP-y circuits a little easier in some cases
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/quantumlib/Stim/issues/683, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAATQRN35WH7Q5S6BW2GYHTYP7CIVAVCNFSM6AAAAABCHC43AGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGA4TMMRRGIZDMNY . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
This should be easy to do, and makes reasoning about ISWAP-y circuits a little easier in some cases