Closed quaquel closed 8 months ago
Would it be useful to have some more test coverage here?
Would it be useful to have some more test coverage here?
Yes, I want to still add a test that reproduces the original error. I just needed the fix last week for the pandemic example I was using.
The current finalizer in futures_util.py assumes that experiment_runner exists in the namespace of the module (i.e., .py file). However, this is only available in each of the separate futures models (i.e., multiprocessing, mpi). This fixes the resulting bug.