quarkiverse / quarkus-openapi-generator

OpenAPI Generator - REST Client Generator
Apache License 2.0
119 stars 80 forks source link

Add wiremock module #648

Closed mcruzdev closed 2 months ago

mcruzdev commented 8 months ago

Many thanks for submitting your Pull Request :heart:!

Please make sure that your PR meets the following requirements:

How to backport a pull request to a different branch? In order to automatically create a **backporting pull request** please add one or more labels having the following format `backport-`, where `` is the name of the branch where the pull request must be backported to (e.g., `backport-quarkus2` to backport the original PR to the `quarkus2` branch). > **NOTE**: **backporting** is an action aiming to move a change (usually a commit) from a branch (usually the main one) to another one, which is generally referring to a still maintained release branch. Keeping it simple: it is about to move a specific change or a set of them from one branch to another. Once the original pull request is successfully merged, the automated action will create one backporting pull request per each label (with the previous format) that has been added. If something goes wrong, the author will be notified and at this point a manual backporting is needed. > **NOTE**: this automated backporting is triggered whenever a pull request on `main` branch is labeled or closed, but both conditions must be satisfied to get the new PR created.
mcruzdev commented 8 months ago

Hi @hbelmiro and @ricardozanini I created the wiremock module, what initial features we need to have to merge to main?

Is it possible to create a branch for wiremock stuff, or just adding an initial feature is ok for now?

github-actions[bot] commented 8 months ago

🎊 PR Preview 4cde6cafb57aa09c359781bbccd764330f8973d5 has been successfully built and deployed. See the documentation preview: https://quarkus-openapi-generator-preview-pr-648.surge.sh

hbelmiro commented 8 months ago

@mcruzdev

what initial features we need to have to merge to main?

From us, you're probably the one who knows more about it. I'll let you decide. Is this wiremock support a real need for you as a user? If so, what are the ones you need the most? From those, pick the easiest/fastest to implement.

Is it possible to create a branch for wiremock stuff, or just adding an initial feature is ok for now? IMO, we can add features incrementally (an initial feature is ok), so users can benefit from them ASAP.

mcruzdev commented 8 months ago

Hi @hbelmiro, Thank you!

It help me a lot, I will continue here!

mcruzdev commented 8 months ago
mcruzdev commented 7 months ago

Hi @hbelmiro and @ricardozanini, I think that we can get a first review about this new feature.

ricardozanini commented 7 months ago

I'd rather wait for #482 to be merged first. @carlesarnal will kick my ass if I keep asking him to rebase.

mcruzdev commented 7 months ago

Just a few comments initially, I'll do a better review later.

I switched the extension to experimental Sound good?

I've added some basic features for starters. It is great for new contributors!

ricardozanini commented 7 months ago

@mcruzdev can you rebase? 🙏

ricardozanini commented 6 months ago

@mcruzdev are the issues pointed by GH relevant?

mcruzdev commented 6 months ago

@mcruzdev are the issues pointed by GH relevant?

Sorry for delay!

I think we can ignore because are Test classes. makes sense?

Unused class: SchemaReaderTest is not referenced within this codebase. If not used as an external API it should be removed.

mcruzdev commented 6 months ago

Hi @hbelmiro thank you for the reviewing it, I will solve all soon!

hbelmiro commented 6 months ago

@mcruzdev can you please let me know when I can re-review it?

mcruzdev commented 6 months ago

Hi @hbelmiro, I think you can review it now! When all things are ok I will do the squash

mcruzdev commented 4 months ago

Hi @hbelmiro and @ricardozanini I think we can wait for merge this pull request, I am seeing here some projects that does similar things and I am collecting some ideas to use here... Another point is: I am very busy and I think if we merge it we will not have effort to upgrade this module faster. WDYT?

github-actions[bot] commented 2 months ago

@ricardozanini @hbelmiro This is being labeled as Stale.

github-actions[bot] commented 2 months ago

@ricardozanini @hbelmiro This is being closed due to inactivity.