Closed galderz closed 1 year ago
@galderz I'm happy to test this with the Quarkus superheroes once there are multi-arch images available somewhere. As I mentioned on #83 I already have the scaffolding & wiring in place. All I need are quay.io/quarkus/ubi-quarkus-mandrel
and quay.io/quarkus/quarkus-micro-image
images that have both amd64 & arm64 platforms available.
@edeandrea No work has been done here to add multi arch support for quarkus-micro-image
. This PR and https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus-images/pull/195 focused on adding multi-arch support for GraalVM and Mandrel container images.
Thanks @galderz . Does that mean in the interim I'd have to switch back to the Dockerfile
that uses FROM registry.access.redhat.com/ubi8/ubi-minimal:8.5
?
Thanks @galderz . Does that mean in the interim I'd have to switch back to the Dockerfile that uses FROM registry.access.redhat.com/ubi8/ubi-minimal:8.5?
Switch what?
A Dockerfile
that uses the quarkus-micro-image
as it's base image (like https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus-super-heroes/blob/main/rest-villains/src/main/docker/Dockerfile.native#L20)
Hmmmm, yeah, I guess you could change FROM
to registry.access.redhat.com/ubi8/ubi-minimal:8.5
and then do things manually yourself if needed. I don't know anything about quarkus-micro-image
TBH.
I'll do that once your work on the ubi-mandrel image is done and those images are available.
This work won't be integrated as is. The partial work in master is not fully working as expected. An effort is ongoing to provide a better solution.
This should close #83, but I think we'll only know if it really works once integrated and we try to push the images. @cescoffier?
/cc @zakkak Clement had suggested that maybe push images script should become a jbang script. WDYT?