Right now, we don't support multitenancy with multiple persistence units or at least the configuration is global. We need to fix that but I have a question first.
I wonder if multitenantSchemaDatasource is still useful given you can now define the datasource used for a given persistence unit? My inclination would be to remove it in favor of using the generic datasource property. Does it make sense?
Right now, we don't support multitenancy with multiple persistence units or at least the configuration is global. We need to fix that but I have a question first.
I wonder if
multitenantSchemaDatasource
is still useful given you can now define thedatasource
used for a given persistence unit? My inclination would be to remove it in favor of using the genericdatasource
property. Does it make sense?/cc @Sanne @michael-schnell