Enforce the platform constraints when resolving the Quarkus bootstrap Gradle resolver dependencies

[aloubyansky]

Fixes https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/issues/43608

[aloubyansky]

This is a quick fix. I think @cdsap would do it differently though. Here is a branch where I tried to re-work it https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/compare/main...aloubyansky:quarkusDev-dependency-warn-config-cache?expand=1 but I'm still missing something, it fails to resolve the platform config.

[quarkus-bot[bot]]

---

:waning_crescent_moon: This workflow status is outdated as a new workflow run has been triggered.

Status for workflow Quarkus CI

This is the status report for running Quarkus CI on commit 8873bf07570687ec6175389b52f42b7f1be24ec8.

Failing Jobs

Status	Name	Step	Failures	Logs	Raw logs	Build scan
✖	Initial JDK 17 Build	Build	Failures	Logs	Raw logs	:mag:

You can consult the Develocity build scans.

Failures

:gear: Initial JDK 17 Build #

- Failing: devtools/gradle/gradle-application-plugin 
! Skipped: integration-tests/gradle 

:package: devtools/gradle/gradle-application-plugin

✖ Failed to execute goal net.revelc.code.formatter:formatter-maven-plugin:2.24.1:validate (default) on project io.quarkus.gradle.plugin: File '/home/runner/work/quarkus/quarkus/devtools/gradle/gradle-application-plugin/src/main/java/io/quarkus/gradle/QuarkusPlugin.java' has not been previously formatted. Please format file (for example by invoking `mvn -f devtools/gradle/gradle-application-plugin net.revelc.code.formatter:formatter-maven-plugin:2.24.1:format`) and commit before running validation!

[quarkus-bot[bot]]

Status for workflow Quarkus CI

This is the status report for running Quarkus CI on commit 94140f2523126e118b44ff52595f3a16fbd13489.

:white_check_mark: The latest workflow run for the pull request has completed successfully.

It should be safe to merge provided you have a look at the other checks in the summary.

You can consult the Develocity build scans.

[gsmet]

@aloubyansky do you want us to merge this one for 3.17?

[aloubyansky]

Yeah, i think it's worth it.