Closed jimkont closed 9 months ago
Is there any additional information I should provide in this PR, or should I maybe split it into separate ones per quantity kind?
No need to split it. Perhaps you hadn't noticed that I had requested one minor change. It is much easier for you to make that change because I don't have access to update your branch.
thanks! unfortunately, I cannot find your comment, could you please point it to me, or request a new change?
It is
unit:MicroGM-PER-deciL should be unit:MicroGM-PER-DeciL
Done! regarding my question on adding the quantitykind:AmountOfSubstancePerUnitVolume
in unit:IU-PER-L
and the new unit:IU-PER-MilliLL
together with a conversion multiplier, do you have any feedback?
I noticed that unit:IU-PER-MilliGM
which is related has quantitykind:AmountOfSubstancePerUnitMass
assigned and also a conversion multiplier, and that is why I ask
Good catch! After researching IU and documenting unit:IU, I was not comprehensive in updating all the instances involving IU. None of those instances should have conversion multipliers. You are invited to make those changes in this PR, or we could go ahead and approve this PR and either you or I could make the other fixes later.
What's your pleasure?
Added the following units, which were mostly copied from existing related units:
in addition, added some missing or alternative ucum symbols in other units.
One question I have is related to the units unit:IU-PER-MilliL (new) and unit:IU-PER-L (existing). in the existing one the description says
The magnitude of one <strong>IU/L</strong> depends on the material, so there is no single conversion multiplier. (See <a href=\"http://qudt.org/vocab/unit/IU)\"><strong>IU</strong></a> for more information)
. To me it seems that the international unitIU
is generic and thequantitykind:AmountOfSubstancePerUnitVolume
could be assigned to both of them (and thus, define the related multipliers) but I wanted to verify this assumption first.