Closed steveraysteveray closed 8 months ago
steveraysteveray
commented
8 months ago You are right. I did not check your development branch. I added it in anticipation of our quantity kinds having pointers to iec61360 codes. It shouldn't hurt that it's defined in both branches, and should merge fine when the time comes.
jhodgesatmb
commented
8 months ago If you need examples there are many QuantityKinds in the dev branch with iec61360Code values.
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 7:19 AM steveraysteveray @.***> wrote:
You are right. I did not check your development branch. I added it in anticipation of our quantity kinds having pointers to iec61360 codes. It shouldn't hurt that it's defined in both branches, and should merge fine when the time comes.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/qudt/qudt-public-repo/pull/847#issuecomment-1889493777, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AATQRWKSKBROFMDNQFA3OUTYOFIAZAVCNFSM6AAAAABBXD3QE6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQOBZGQ4TGNZXG4 . You are receiving this because your review was requested.Message ID: @.***>
-- Jack
I added this property into the development branch for other work I was doing but how did it come to be needed on the main branch? Did I mess something up?
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 1:00 PM QUDT @.***> wrote:
-- Jack