sessionID in Send message not consider TargetSubID, ServerSubId, TargetLocationID etc

[susannamartinelli]

version: 0.6.0

I've started a new Initiatior/Acceptor session. Both components has in correctly configured TargetCompID, TargetSubID, TargetLocationID, SenderCompID, SenderSubID, SenderLocationID in his own configuration files (SESSION part)

After the Logon went correctly the Initiator creates a new key in sessions variable (file registry.go) with the following value: FIX.4.2:MyInititiatorCompID/MyInititiatorSubID/MyInititiatorLocationID-> MyTargetCompID/MyTargetSubID/MyTargetLocationID...

However from the Initiator side if I send a message with the correct tag:

        msg := quickfix.NewMessage()
    msg.Header.SetString(tag.MsgType, "D")
    msg.Header.SetString(tag.SenderCompID, "MyInititiatorCompID")
    msg.Header.SetString(tag.SenderSubID, "MyInititiatorSubID")
    msg.Header.SetString(tag.SenderLocationID, "MyInititiatorLocationID")
    msg.Header.SetString(tag.TargetCompID, "MyTargetCompID")
    msg.Header.SetString(tag.TargetSubID, "MyTargetSubID")
    msg.Header.SetString(tag.TargetLocationID,  "MyTargetLocationID")
    msg.Header.SetString(tag.BeginString, "FIX.4.2")
        ...

It returns to me Unknow session. I've noticed that in registry.go in this line https://github.com/quickfixgo/quickfix/blob/90abc7fbcb82e4f15f75a593ea947667810c019e/registry.go#L37 you search the sessionID with only BeginString, TargetCompID and SenderCompID by omitting SenderSubID, SenderLocationID, TargetSubID, TargetLocationID in sessions created before and this cause the Unknow session error

Thanks

[frozenpine]

same issue, OnBehalfOfSubID is discarded in my case, and server reject my message.

[frozenpine]

i found that logon procedure handled in session.go

func (s *session) sendLogonInReplyTo(resetStore, setResetSeqNum bool, inReplyTo *Message) error {
    logon := NewMessage()
    logon.Header.SetField(tagMsgType, FIXString("A"))
    logon.Header.SetField(tagBeginString, FIXString(s.sessionID.BeginString))
    logon.Header.SetField(tagTargetCompID, FIXString(s.sessionID.TargetCompID))
    logon.Header.SetField(tagSenderCompID, FIXString(s.sessionID.SenderCompID))
    logon.Body.SetField(tagEncryptMethod, FIXString("0"))
    logon.Body.SetField(tagHeartBtInt, FIXInt(s.HeartBtInt.Seconds()))

    if setResetSeqNum {
        logon.Body.SetField(tagResetSeqNumFlag, FIXBoolean(true))
    }

    if len(s.DefaultApplVerID) > 0 {
        logon.Body.SetField(tagDefaultApplVerID, FIXString(s.DefaultApplVerID))
    }

    if err := s.dropAndSendInReplyTo(logon, resetStore, inReplyTo); err != nil {
        return err
    }

    return nil
}

in this function, only common tag is handled, and this function is owned by private structure session.

so is this means i can't handle logon procedure in my code and use some extra tag in logon message?

[Arvi89]

Same here, I need those extra fields otherwise I'd have duplicated sessions, but it's not taken into account in send() I can manage and handle this myself, just I would prefer using the updated send function :)