Throughout the text, we see repeated citations used each time a given term is mentioned.
For example:
Original:
Endpoints MUST treat a request or response that contains undefined or
invalid pseudo-header fields as malformed (Section 4.1.3).
[Then, only one sentence later..]
Any request or response that contains a pseudo-header field that
appears in a header section after a regular header field MUST be
treated as malformed (Section 4.1.3).
Please consider whether each citation is necessary or if the
repetition may begin to distract the reader.
In the HTML copy, this could be addressed by making the term itself a hyperlink, rather than spelling out the cross-reference in text each time. (See, for example, the hyperlinking of frame names in the HTTP/2 specification.)
MikeBishop
commented
2 years ago
The RFC Editor asks:
In the HTML copy, this could be addressed by making the term itself a hyperlink, rather than spelling out the cross-reference in text each time. (See, for example, the hyperlinking of frame names in the HTTP/2 specification.)