Closed MikeBishop closed 2 years ago
Note that while the style guide says to use 6265bis for COOKIES, I'm continuing to point to RFC 6265 unless and until we decide to take another delaying dependency. (I note that http-core also uses RFC 6265.)
That sounds very sensible to me, especially given the context in which they are spoken to in this document.
Fixes #4951 and some other things besides. This presupposes a resolution of https://github.com/httpwg/admin/issues/41 to be "treat them the same as regular fields," which is ugly but logically consistent. Easy enough to adjust if that isn't the eventual decision, of course.