Closed LPardue closed 2 years ago
Looking at RFC 9000, these aren't source code, but are artwork, and without a type:
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt="" pn="section-19.8-5.1">
STREAM Frame {
Type (i) = 0x08..0x0f,
Stream ID (i),
[Offset (i)],
[Length (i)],
Stream Data (..),
}
</artwork>
I'd suggest matching that.
Matching RFC9000 SGTM
Please review whether the "type" attribute should be set for the sourcecode element in the XML file. If the current list of preferred values for "type" (https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/sourcecode-types.txt) does not contain an applicable type, then feel free to suggest a new one. Also, it is acceptable to leave the "type" attribute not set.