Somewhat related to #193 (that moved text that was ACK_MP specific to all the multi path-specific frames), we currently state in the ACK_MP section that
If an endpoint receives an ACK_MP frame with a Connection ID sequence
number which was never issued (i.e., with a sequence number
larger than the largest one advertised), it MUST treat this as a connection
error of type MP_PROTOCOL_VIOLATION and close the connection.
Should we also react the same way with PATH_ABANDON and PATH_STATUS frames? I would say yes, but would be great to agree on this.
Somewhat related to #193 (that moved text that was ACK_MP specific to all the multi path-specific frames), we currently state in the ACK_MP section that
Should we also react the same way with PATH_ABANDON and PATH_STATUS frames? I would say yes, but would be great to agree on this.