quicwg / multipath

In-progress version of draft-ietf-quic-multipath
Other
49 stars 17 forks source link

How should the receiver react if it receives Connection IDs for non-authorised paths IDs? #336

Closed mirjak closed 2 weeks ago

mirjak commented 2 months ago

Closing the connection with some MP_PROTOCOL_VIOLATION error?

michael-eriksson commented 2 months ago

Yes.

A side note: I don't really see the point of MP_PROTOCOL_VIOLATION; why is RFC 9000's PROTOCOL_VIOLATION not good enough?

mirjak commented 2 weeks ago

This is already specified in section 7 (New Frames). PR #386 add a forward reference from section 3.5 (Allocating, Consuming, and Retiring Connection IDs).

Closing this issue as there is nothing that needs to be changed.