search

quicwg / multipath

In-progress version of draft-ietf-quic-multipath
Other
49 stars 17 forks source link

Capitalization and usage consistency #346

Closed MikeBishop closed 1 month ago

MikeBishop commented 1 month ago

Purely editorial nit; maybe do a global pass right before submission, but consider when updating existing text.

In RFC 9000 et al., there is a subtle distinction between capitalized and uncapitalized terms. The "connection ID" is the value, while "Connection ID" is the field in a packet or frame. The term "CID" never appears; DCID and SCID abbreviations are only used in examples. This draft does not appear to follow that distinction or have a similar distinction between the "path ID" and "Path ID" fields.

(The draft is also inconsistent between "ID" and "identifier", though RFC 9000 could have been improved there as well.)

mirjak commented 1 month ago

Thanks! This was already mainly addressed in #334 and I now also removed CID in #352.

mirjak commented 1 month ago

Path ID/path identifier use still had issues. Also merged #356 now!