search

quicwg / multipath

In-progress version of draft-ietf-quic-multipath
Other
48 stars 17 forks source link

How should a client signal that it does not have enough CIDs to use for multiple unused path identifiers? #370

Closed yfmascgy closed 1 month ago

yfmascgy commented 1 month ago

Currently, the draft states:

To let the peer open a new path, an endpoint needs to provide its peer with connection IDs for at least one unused path identifier.

However, what if the client has an unused CID for Path ID 2 but lacks a CID for Path ID 3 and wants to concurrently open both paths 2 and 3? How should a client signal that it does not have enough CIDs to use for multiple unused path identifiers?

mirjak commented 1 month ago

This is already discussed in issue #338. Please comment there and close this issue!

mirjak commented 1 month ago

Closing. Please discuss in #338 (or reopen if that doesn't work)