This PR try to solve the issue #324 and remove the outdated text.
As @martinthomson pointed out in PR #372, we don't have to use a count. This would help remove the ambiguity in the old draft version:
When endpoints negotiate a transport parameter value with N, but initial path(Path ID = 0) is also count into the number, the max available path id is actually N-1. It's weird and doesn't match the description of Max Path ID field inside MAX_PATH frame.
I'm convinced by people in issue #381 that we could allow the initial_max_path_id to be set to 0. Updated the PR.
Thanks to @mirjak @marten-seemann and @huitema.
This PR try to solve the issue #324 and remove the outdated text.
As @martinthomson pointed out in PR #372, we don't have to use a count. This would help remove the ambiguity in the old draft version: