quicwg / multipath

In-progress version of draft-ietf-quic-multipath
Other
49 stars 17 forks source link

Use of Respectively without a sequence #410

Open gloinul opened 1 month ago

gloinul commented 1 month ago

Section 3.3: "Respectively, if there is still an active path, it is RECOMMENDED to send the PATH_ABANDON frames on another path." This sentence is a bit strange, why is "respectively" used, I don't see how the recommendation are as a result of an enumerated order of any kind.

mirjak commented 1 month ago

I think the word "respectively" is okay here, however, this and the previous sentence are bit redundant, so I proposed to merge them in PR #420.

gloinul commented 1 month ago

Use of respectively when not actually enumerating appears to not match the word use.

Independently the PR #420 looks good to solve this.