Closed Pascualex closed 2 years ago
That draft expired last January. It looks like the current WebTransport draft is draft-ietf-webtrans-http3, which builds on top of h3 rather than raw QUIC. Presumably Chrome is therefore using the h3 ALPN. If in doubt, wireshark should be able to tell you what ALPNs the client is offering.
I had tried a bunch of ALPNs, including h3-27
, h3-29
and h3-32
but not the simple h3
.
It's working now, thank you.
Chrome throws the following error: peer doesn't support any known protocol.
Incidentally, this isn't actually a Chrome error, but a rustls error being piped all the way back down to the client. Pretty neat that that's being propagated gracefully!
I've checked this closed issue #934 and it looks like the problem persists.
Following the IETF draft specification I've set the "wq-vvv-01" ALPN in my server. Just to be completely sure, I've checked the values of my
alpn_protocols
and they are in fact the expected sequence:0x77 0x71 0x2d 0x76 0x76 0x76 0x2d 0x30 0x31
.Chrome throws the following error:
peer doesn't support any known protocol
.It isn't completely broken since when I don't specify any ALPN the error changes to:
no application protocol
.I'm testing this with Chrome Beta, but version 97 will go out in January with WebTransport support, so this use case may start to be more common.