Read files directly

[mcmcgrath13]

Thanks! Could you also update the type generation uses of JSON.read to no longer do the file checks? Seems like it shouldn't be necessary anymore with this change.

[mcmcgrath13]

Sorry for the add on, but could you also add a test for this?

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Base: 88.36% // Head: 88.37% // Increases project coverage by +0.00% :tada:

Coverage data is based on head (efb0b0c) compared to base (8569ff9). Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

:exclamation: Current head efb0b0c differs from pull request most recent head 2ae5e08. Consider uploading reports for the commit 2ae5e08 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #243 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 88.36% 88.37% ======================================= Files 9 9 Lines 1728 1729 +1 ======================================= + Hits 1527 1528 +1 Misses 201 201 ``` | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/quinnj/JSON3.jl/pull/243?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Jacob+Quinn) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [src/read.jl](https://codecov.io/gh/quinnj/JSON3.jl/pull/243/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Jacob+Quinn#diff-c3JjL3JlYWQuamw=) | `88.62% <100.00%> (+0.03%)` | :arrow_up: | Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Jacob+Quinn). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Jacob+Quinn)

:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[onetonfoot]

Good thing you asked for some test cases, it wasn't behaving as expected when reading types

[rafaqz]

Any chance we can get this merged?

[quinnj]

@mcmcgrath13 does this look good to you? I think it LGTM