quintel / energymixer

Answer multiple-choice questions to determine a future energy scenario – Not maintained
http://mixer.et-model.com
1 stars 0 forks source link

EnergyMixer on Energiepodiumdiner.nl doesn't seem to work anymore #238

Closed dennisquintel closed 8 years ago

dennisquintel commented 8 years ago

Error:

Error: {"errors":["Input transport_useful_demand_ships does not exist"]}
dennisquintel commented 8 years ago

including @jorisberkhout @ChaelKruip and @AlexanderWirtz

RobTerwel commented 8 years ago
Error: {"errors":["Input transport_useful_demand_ships does not exist"]}

That input statement is now called transport_useful_demand_ship_kms.

dennisquintel commented 8 years ago

That input statement is now called transport_useful_demand_ship_kms.

:+1: Thanks!

dennisquintel commented 8 years ago

@RobTerwel could you try to adapt the input statements in the database?

RobTerwel commented 8 years ago

:+1: I'll try and ask @grdw for help if need be.

dennisquintel commented 8 years ago

:+1: I'll try and ask @grdw for help if need be.

Thanks!

RobTerwel commented 8 years ago

The input statements have been updated to transport_useful_demand_ship_kms. However, there is an input which no longer exists: gas_from_middle_east_share was deleted in https://github.com/quintel/etsource/pull/1007, because it had been replaced (in kind) by lng_from_qatar_share here.

I see two main options:

  • replacing gas_from_middle_east_share with lng_from_qatar_share which results in the problem that the shares don't add up to 100% since they are part of different share_groups.
  • removing gas_from_middle_east_share and adding the value previously assigned to it to gas_from_algeria_share

@dennisschoenmakers @AlexanderWirtz @ChaelKruip @jorisberkhout , do you have a preference or alternative ideas?

jorisberkhout commented 8 years ago

I prefer the second option.

dennisquintel commented 8 years ago

I prefer the second option.

I'm okay with that!

RobTerwel commented 8 years ago

I prefer the second option.

I'm okay with that!

Done! However, I stumbled on one more thing: the hybrid heatpump (HHP) input statement was misspelt, which I fixed. But as a consequence of replacing the HP add on with the (HHP) in this PR, we now have an overfull share group for heating_households for question 8 answer D:

"Oude en nieuwe gebouwen zijn goed geïsoleerd en maken gebruik van de nieuwste verwarmingstechnieken (HRe, warmtepompen op gas of elektriciteit, hout-CV kachels en gasgestookte brandstofcellen)."

gives

heating_households" group does not balance: group sums to 110.0 using 
households_space_heater_heatpump_ground_water_electricity_share=55.0 
households_space_heater_micro_chp_network_gas_share=15.0 
households_space_heater_coal_share=0.0 
households_space_heater_combined_network_gas_share=0.0
households_space_heater_electricity_share=0.0 
households_space_heater_hybrid_heatpump_air_water_electricity_share=10.0 
households_space_heater_network_gas_share=5.0 
households_space_heater_district_heating_steam_hot_water_share=10.0
households_space_heater_crude_oil_share=0.0 
households_space_heater_wood_pellets_share=15.0 
households_space_heater_heatpump_air_water_electricity_share=0.0

Can I subtract 10.0 from households_space_heater_heatpump_ground_water_electricity_share or does any of you have a different victim in mind?

ChaelKruip commented 8 years ago

Can I subtract 10.0 from households_space_heater_heatpump_ground_water_electricity_share or does any of you have a different victim in mind?

:+1:

RobTerwel commented 8 years ago

Done!

Closing.