Closed robcalon closed 2 weeks ago
@noracato could you also have a look at the options for this one?
This issue has had no activity for 60 days and will be closed in 7 days. Removing the "Stale" label or posting a comment will prevent it from being closed automatically. You can also add the "Pinned" label to ensure it isn't marked as stale in the future.
Should be fixed now!
When processing scenario parameters the inputs endpoint at https://engine.energytransitionmodel.com/api/v3/scenarios/xxxx/inputs provides valuable information on which parameters are active in the model and which parameters are disabled. Unfortunately, all parameters are set to disabled when accessing a read_only scenario making it harder to process read_only scenarios from this endpoint.
Would it be possible to add an addition flag to the input parameters to make a distinction between the parameter being used by ETEngine in evaluating the scenario and the current user being allowed to change the parameter via the API?
Additionally a third field could be desirable to indicate if an external coupling node has been activated. I currently see only two imperfect ways to check if an external coupling node is in use:
Especially with the recently implemented multi user support for scenarios I'm expecting some issues when read_only users need to export scenario data via the API.