Open marliekeverweij opened 2 years ago
This issue has had no activity for 60 days and will be closed in 7 days. Removing the "Stale" label or posting a comment will prevent it from being closed automatically. You can also add the "Pinned" label to ensure it isn't marked as stale in the future.
To summarise: installed capacities seem to be a more widely used point of reference for source data than full load hours for heat and power plants. Ideally we would therefore rework both ETLocal and ETSource, to accept installed capacities, instead of full load hours.
This is an enhancement idea that may be picked up at some point.
At the moment the ETM Dataset Manager needs three specification for power plants:
For (old) power plants that have not been active in that year there will be no electricity production, this means that no installed capacity will be present in the ETM. It would be nice to see all power plants in the base year reflected, then you know all plants that are already built and you do not have to build new ones (incl. costs).
Therefore, we were thinking that it would be nice to set the installed capacity in the ETM DM directly together with the full load hours OR the electricity production. I was wondering: is this possible? Then we probably have to add a new
graph_method
for capacity.....