Closed marliekeverweij closed 6 years ago
Shall I also take a sustainability_share of 1.0 for bunkers_flexibility_p2g_electricity and change the sustainability_share of industry_flexibility_p2g_electricity to 1.0?
I think so yes. @DorinevanderVlies do you agree?
Yes I agree!
Okay we will do that, thanks for answering so quickly :)
At the moment I am modelling a new hydrogen plant for the production of power-to-kerosene. I am using most attribute-values from the node
industry_flexibility_p2g_electricity
for this new node. Inindustry_flexibility_p2g_electricity
I see a sustainability_share of 0.0. This surprises me since this hydrogen is produced from excess electricity. Hydrogen for transport which is produced inenergy_flexibility_p2g_electricity
does have a sustainability_share of 1.0.Shall I also take a sustainability_share of 1.0 for
bunkers_flexibility_p2g_electricity
and change the sustainability_share ofindustry_flexibility_p2g_electricity
to 1.0?Since I have read the following previous discussions (https://github.com/quintel/etmodel/issues/2403 , https://github.com/quintel/etsource/pull/1278 , https://github.com/quintel/etmodel/issues/2269 ), I will include @DorinevanderVlies and @ChaelKruip in this issue.