Open marliekeverweij opened 6 years ago
This issue has had no activity for 60 days and will be closed in 7 days. Removing the "Stale" label or posting a comment will prevent it from being closed automatically. You can also add the "Pinned" label to ensure it isn't marked as stale in the future.
@marliekeverweij I assume you want to keep this issue op as you re-opened it 9days ago. If you want to keep a 'stale' issue open, you have to remove the 'stale' label.
This issue has had no activity for 60 days and will be closed in 7 days. Removing the "Stale" label or posting a comment will prevent it from being closed automatically. You can also add the "Pinned" label to ensure it isn't marked as stale in the future.
I just found this issue; when the yearly total solar production of households is the same as the yearly total electricity consumption then the primary CO2-emissions for electricity in households are zero! Even though the households consume 'fossil electricity' throughout the year, this is not included in the yearly demand.
For example in Hengstdal (which only has households) the CO2 reduction can be 100% (even though there are still fossil plants running throughout the year):
The same issue goes for buildings!