Power plant labels should be aligned for the merit order chart and table and hourly electricity production

[mabijkerk]

The labels for power plants in the chart "Merit order capacities and marginal costs", the table "Merit order table" and the chart "Electricity production per hour", do not align. This can be confusing for users.

For example, the slider Coal conventional has the following labels:

• Merit order chart: Coal SC
• Merit order table: Coal conventional
• Hourly electricity production chart: Coal conventional

And the slider Onshore inland has the following labels:

• Merit order chart: Onshore wind turbines
• Merit order table: Wind (onshore)
• Hourly electricity production chart: Wind turbines onshore inland

I propose to use the same label for each power plant.

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue has had no activity for 60 days and will be closed in 7 days. Removing the "Stale" label or posting a comment will prevent it from being closed automatically. You can also add the "Pinned" label to ensure it isn't marked as stale in the future.

[mabijkerk]

This issue extends to charts where heat is supplied by CHPs, such as the heat network mekko, the properties of combined heat and power (CHP) plants, or the hourly supply of heat to the district heat network. See below for a discrepancy between slider names and labels in the industrial heat network mekko:

I propose to create an overview of all the producers in merit and assign a single label to them, which is then to be implemented throughout the model.

It should be noted that in some cases a slightly different version of the label is required.

• For example, in the Industry section, the gas motor CHP can be called just that. In the merit order table it however should be called gas motor CHP (industry) to distinguish it from the gas motor CHP (district heating).