search

quintel / etmoses

Online decision support tool to create local energy situations for neighbourhoods, cities and regions with a time resolution of 15 minutes created and maintained by Quintel – Not maintained
https://moses.energytransitionmodel.com
MIT License
11 stars 3 forks source link

Capping of solar PV not taken into account in stacked chart #1590

Closed DorinevanderVlies closed 7 years ago

DorinevanderVlies commented 7 years ago

Summary

Capping of solar PV is shown in the total chart, but not in the stacked chart. (the strategies switch is activated)

The third week June of Node 3 - portiekflat of this LES shows a difference with and without strategies in the total chart. However, the stacked chart is the same with and without strategies.

For example for EV strategies I did see differences in the stacked chart with and without strategies.

Images

image image image

ChaelKruip commented 7 years ago

@antw @grdw do you have any ideas why this is?

grdw commented 7 years ago

My gut feeling tells me that this is probably a JavaScript bug. @DorinevanderVlies Could you try it with another strategy and see if the changes are reflected in the stacked chart?

DorinevanderVlies commented 7 years ago

I made the LES even simpler.

Could you try it with another strategy and see if the changes are reflected in the stacked chart?

Other strategies in this LES also cause trouble when shown in the stacked chart. In this example I selected "storage in batteries prioritising local PV production". The nodes are serial. However node K+Z 2 shows a different stacked chart than node 2 - portiekflat.

The total chart is, as it should be, the same for both nodes.

image

image

grdw commented 7 years ago

I don't really know what you're saying (sorry), but is the shape of the stacked chart (with strategies) the same as the full/non-stacked chart without strategies for a single node?