Closed StijnDellaert closed 11 years ago
My only suggestion is that I messed things up with setting a value (0) from the energy balance for the energy_distribution_network_gas_loss converter. Since the loss is simultaneously defined as 0.11% of the distribution converter. However, this 0.11% "conversion-efficiency" should not have this old value..
I guess Refinery should trip on that
Can you test it by removing the conversion efficiency?
How to solve this? we can find the 4 loss demands (heat, electricity, gas, crude oil) in the energy balance and want to use those values. So a new conversion efficiency should be calculated based on the loss and the total demand of the distribution converter. THis conversion efficiency should then be set and used in the ETM if demands change..
Ideas @ChaelKruip & @antw ?
@wmeyers , I can try that first. but those efficiencies will be needed by the ETM, I think
So are you saying this conversion needs a dynamic conversion effiiency, based on the current country and start year?
I thought it was agreed that efficiencies would be "global", i.e. the same in every region? The import script which creates/updates the .ad
files reads a number of efficiencies from the InputExcel YAML files for this reason; that's where the 0.11% comes from.
I'm not sure that explains why the gas network node has zero demand though. @StijnDellaert Can you push your changes to a GitHub branch at some point so I can find out what Refinery is doing?
Pushed to heat_network branch https://github.com/quintel/etsource/commit/2f6f753a2ba026fabc0a2b1e61df85ae3a741741
OK, the issue is that within a carrier group, the shares must add up to 1. I defined child shares that up to 1 but contain different carriers. This is not a problem of Refinery and @wouterterlouw and I will try to fix this.
Assigning @StijnDellaert
@wouterterlouw & me temporarily fixed the mixer conversion problem. It still seems that this loss thing is a problem though.
Can this be closed? The loss issue is described in #40.
Yes, closing
I have strange errors in my locally calculated graph.
(calculable graph) It claims to know the value of
energy_national_gas_network_natural_gas
, but sets it to zero, while there are several non-zero demands linked to this converter...Also, the
energy_mixer_for_gas_power_fuel
has a known demand and known child shares, but still it says that the crude oil child can not be calculated...My only suggestion is that I messed things up with setting a value (0) from the energy balance for the
energy_distribution_network_gas_loss
converter. Since the loss is simultaneously defined as 0.11% of the distribution converter. However, this 0.11% "conversion-efficiency" should not have this old value..