Closed jonahgreenthal closed 4 years ago
(@rhentzel pointed this out)
Redundant, sure. Probably just an artifact about visualizing this in our heads as a join table.
Can we remove it without having to do a major version bump? That also seems, in a soft sense, unnecessary.
Not if you want to strictly adhere to semantic versioning. But would removing it break anything anywhere? I doubt it.
It won't break anything. I'm inclined to just kill it and bump the minor version.
A
Pool
contains 0 or morePoolTeam
s. APoolTeam
has a reference back toPool
. The latter is unnecessary, right?