Open alopezlago opened 2 years ago
I'm sort of wary of getting into defining a detailed way to represent questions as a part of this schema — it seems like a major topic unto itself. But we also have already started down that path. @puls what do you think?
I'm pretty strongly inclined to declare that modeling questions and packets is outside the scope of this schema. It would be a good topic for another schema, and once that's done we could certainly define "this field is a Question object as described by [other schema]" and so on.
I'd be glad to collaborate on that as another project. Anyone else interested?
The
Question
schema doesn't describe how formatting should be represented: HTML, Markdown, some other format? If we want tools to produce packets that follow this schema we need to know how we want to mark italics/underlining/bolding.