A recent forum topic reminds me that these docs should have an explicit license statement.
I thought they did, but I can't find it either.
For all original content, I propose using CC-BY 4.0 and adding a statement to that effect to the Acknowledgements page. Where screenshots are derived from images using different licenses, reuse might also require referencing them - if so, that info should also be on the acknowledgements page.
From the Contributors I see that the only other people who have committed to the docs are
@melvingelbard
@dkurt
@zindy
@astrojuanlu
If any of you have opinions on this (or prefer your commits excluded if moving to CC-BY) please let me know - otherwise I'll make the changes sometime early in the new year.
A recent forum topic reminds me that these docs should have an explicit license statement.
I thought they did, but I can't find it either.
For all original content, I propose using CC-BY 4.0 and adding a statement to that effect to the Acknowledgements page. Where screenshots are derived from images using different licenses, reuse might also require referencing them - if so, that info should also be on the acknowledgements page.
From the Contributors I see that the only other people who have committed to the docs are
If any of you have opinions on this (or prefer your commits excluded if moving to CC-BY) please let me know - otherwise I'll make the changes sometime early in the new year.
Thanks!