quran / quran.com-frontend

quran.com frontend
https://quran.com
MIT License
994 stars 360 forks source link

Homepage does not communicate well #803

Closed mmahalwy closed 6 years ago

mmahalwy commented 7 years ago

We have really high bounce rate on the homepage. In my opinion, and when speaking to a designer, we don't communicate what quran.com does. For example, Airbnb tells you what they do and gives you the tools to customize your experience (search, etc).

image

Meanwhile, we took legacy.quran.com and made it look nicer. Thoughts around concepts we can do for the homepage? Ideally, we'd A/B test it

mmahalwy commented 7 years ago

To begin, what I will do is transform our homepage into sketch so we can have people contribute on the design

adiled commented 7 years ago

@mmahalwy will it go on invision? I don't have MacOS but I want to contribute, perhaps I could contribute there. If so, can I get an invite?

thabti commented 7 years ago

@m-adilshaikh @mmahalwy can we also use Zeplin, to ensure that everyone can view the designs.

We need to ask AhmedGalal for the sketch files.

mmahalwy commented 7 years ago

Sure +1 to both.

naveed-ahmad commented 7 years ago

Sadly can't contribute in UI but as a user I would love to have these features on home page:

mmahalwy commented 7 years ago

@naveed-ahmad awesome suggestions! I think we definitely need to make auth work. one.quran.com has been stagnated and we should work on it again to make it work

alirobe commented 7 years ago

I would suggest that there are many really good designers, who would love to contribute to this effort to "increase conversion" (so much more appropriate in this context than most websites I deal with!)... But they aren't likely to be on Github. :)

I've sent a tweet to http://gould.sydney/ referring him to this issue on GH. perhaps if anyone else knows good designers who could help pro-bono, they could also reach out on behance, twitter, etc?

P.S. I wouldn't emphasize logging in until you get to functionality that requires it. Engagement should be the goal, not registration.

mmahalwy commented 7 years ago

Thanks @alirobe for tweeting that out! We do need designers, you are right. I can take a look at Dribbble

CC: @rubel90

yazinsai commented 7 years ago

A good place to start would be to analyze the incoming search traffic. Where is it coming from? What are people expecting to see? If you can share an export from GA, I'm happy to sift through it and kick this process off.

Big picture, I would suggest something like this:

Thoughts?

imadmk commented 7 years ago

@m-adilshaikh Maybe we can use Invision Inspect too. Great tool i found besides zeplin. And you can join the chat on https://quranslack.herokuapp.com

alirobe commented 7 years ago

Just in terms of observing interactions and iterative design improvements, I've found www.hotjar.com to be very helpful. Watching people trying to achieve something can be quite illuminating. It's not necessarily important that the visual design be 'pixel perfect', just that it should help people get where they want to go.

mmahalwy commented 7 years ago

@yazinsai I can certainly add you to the Google Analytics account. Ultimately, it would be great to democratize all the data/analytics we have for Quran.com for anyone to help and contribute. Need to figure out the best way to do that.

@alirobe agreed! hotjar could get expensive if no one is watching and paying attention to them. Let's add Google Tag Manager first and it will allow us to easily add and remove tools like this?

yazinsai commented 7 years ago

@mmahalwy yes, please! I'm yazin87 [at] gmail

mmahalwy commented 6 years ago

Salam all, wanted to resurface this. Would be great to get thoughts!

adiled commented 6 years ago

@mmahalwy Any insights to better understand the cause? If there is some activity before bounce, heatmaps etc could help

mmahalwy commented 6 years ago

@m-adilshaikh happy to dig up anything you'd like!

UmanShahzad commented 6 years ago

It'd be interesting to compare bouncing on a site like this to 'bouncing' away from a real Qur'an? What're the main use cases of Quran.com? If it's to read the Qur'an, then this comparison would be useful -- what normally turns a person off from reading? Although that question is broad and might be quite out of scope ;p

I do think, though, that implementing user accounts would be a strong way to attach people to the site. It's hard to reflect on where you are with the Qur'an unless there's some kind of easy-to-retrieve record, whether that be in your head or on a site with bookmarks and what not. When you know that you're here or there on that site, you go to check it. tl;dr move forward with one.quran.com? It feels like the most sensible next step for increasing retention.

mmahalwy commented 6 years ago

@UmanShahzad I agree. I think we should revive one.quran.com

BattouSaeen commented 6 years ago

Salaam - I came back to Quran.com after several months ... didn't it used to have a login feature that allowed bookmarking and saving settings? I tried searching for update/release logs for why it was removed but couldn't find anything. Would like to have it back!