Closed cneud closed 4 years ago
added in 1dd5acd66f7ef9e0bced41f81eabc8ac30f2508a
First testing sessions show that OCR correction would require two more options for more efficent handling:
c.) add
: the same function as b.) split
but without a copy of the text content from the above row.
d.) delete
: deletes the current row with its text content and updates the offsets.
Both can be worked around by function a.) and b.), but this takes a lot of time.
Sometimes it is necessary to either merge or split tokens, e.g. due to segmentation errors.
There are 2 basic operations that should be supported here:
a)
merge
: concatenates the text content of the current row with that of the above row, deletes the row and updates the offsetsb)
split
: adds a new row below with the text content of the current row copied there and updates the offsets