Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Hey again,
just to be sure we're on the same side: would a new command line switch for the
standalone version that enables debug output be sufficient? Because the output
code is largely already present, just not enabled in the productive versions,
and it does produce a lot of output.
Original comment by jul...@gmail.com
on 26 May 2012 at 9:18
I find that in the standalone version it produces too much already ;)
Original comment by damien.p...@gmail.com
on 26 May 2012 at 7:49
oh, so you want it LESS verbose?
Original comment by jul...@gmail.com
on 26 May 2012 at 8:01
yes! if you run it on big collection you don't want to see each step it pass
by, only errors that happens
so it could be nice if in the future "trace" become something you can choose or
not
Original comment by damien.p...@gmail.com
on 26 May 2012 at 8:24
I guess that sounds reasonable. Will look into it once the time to do so
presents itself.
Original comment by jul...@gmail.com
on 29 May 2012 at 9:50
finally got around to implementing this in r04ea9c3368aa.
what i've done is change the default behavior to being quiet; i.e. only the
desired tagged output text is printed.
verbosity can be enabled using two new command line switches: -v for verbose
(INFO-level) and -vv for very verbose (ALL).
damien,
in case you want to try it out, i'm attaching a .jar file that reflects the
current development status. you should be able to use it as a drop-in
replacement for the current stable version. if you happen to find any
undesirable behavior, please let us know here.
Original comment by jul...@gmail.com
on 26 Jun 2012 at 1:13
Attachments:
I tried, it works good!
Thanks for the enhancement
Original comment by damien.p...@gmail.com
on 27 Jun 2012 at 1:43
thanks for the feedback! i've played around with it, it seems to work just as
expected. setting this to verified.
Original comment by jul...@gmail.com
on 27 Jun 2012 at 3:14
Original comment by j.z...@stud.uni-heidelberg.de
on 18 Apr 2013 at 10:11
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
damien.p...@gmail.com
on 25 May 2012 at 8:02