qwaider / morphisto

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/morphisto
0 stars 0 forks source link

Tags descriptions #18

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Where can I find a description for the tagset used in the German morphology 
(SMOR/morphisto)? For example, for adjectives there seems to be all these: 
<ADJ>, <Adj>, <+ADJ>

Basically I want to establish a common ground with morphisto's tags and 
Apertium's tags:
http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Tags

Thanks!

Original issue reported on code.google.com by hecto...@gmail.com on 1 Jun 2011 at 7:07

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
This article is related:

http://www.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/projekte/gramotron/PAPERS/LREC04/smor.pdf

Original comment by hecto...@gmail.com on 11 Jun 2011 at 2:11

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Shouldn't that be the STTS tagset?
http://www.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/projekte/corplex/TagSets/stts-table.html

<Adj> is not a POS tag, but a SMOR inflection class. <+ADJ> is probably 
syntactic sugar that denotes the the part-of-speech of the final word 
production product.

Original comment by CWRSimon@googlemail.com on 11 Jun 2011 at 3:16

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Nope, morphisto does not use STTS. Consider for example

> gib
geben<+V><Imp><Sg>

Which would be assigned VVIMP in STTS. Also, the distinction between auxiliary 
(VA), modal (VM) and ordinary verbs is not present in morphisto. A good guess 
would be the so called "Zehn-Wortarten-Lehre" 
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wortart#Standardform:_Zehn-Wortarten-Lehre). 
Additional classification may be inferred from the inflectional features.

Original comment by wuerz...@gmail.com on 25 Aug 2011 at 9:23

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Is this still an issue? IMHO this can be closed.

Original comment by CWRSimon@googlemail.com on 8 Sep 2011 at 7:06

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I think it is, as the discussion "VPRE" vs. "PTKL/Vz" shows. 

Original comment by wuerz...@gmail.com on 9 Sep 2011 at 2:05