basic form of hoch is hoch and not hoh

qwaider / morphisto

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/morphisto

0 stars 0 forks source link

basic form of hoch is hoch and not hoh #27

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

If a linguistic problem:
What wordform makes the faulty analysis occur?
>hoch
hoh<+ADJ><Pos><Pred>
hoh<+ADJ><Pos><Adv>

>höher
hoch<+ADJ><Comp><Pred>
hoch<+ADJ><Comp><Adv>

>höchst
hoch<+ADJ><Sup><Pred>

The basic form of hoch is hoch and not hoh, as morphisto states.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by eleonor...@gmx.net on 19 Aug 2011 at 3:23

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Fix is to modify:
<Base_Stems>hoc:hh:<><ADJ><base><nativ><AdjPos>
to 
<Base_Stems>hoch<><ADJ><base><nativ><AdjPos>
in lexicon

Original comment by eleonor...@gmx.net on 19 Aug 2011 at 9:48

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Thanks for reporting. Sadly, things are not that easy. If I apply the fix (in 
some modified way to the underlying xml), we lose the correct paradigm of hoch 
(i.e., "der hohe Berg" etc.). Christian, any suggestions?

Original comment by wuerz...@gmail.com on 24 Aug 2011 at 4:28

Changed state: Accepted
Added labels: Priority-High
Removed labels: Priority-Medium

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by wuerz...@gmail.com on 24 Aug 2011 at 4:31