Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I'm not sure that I agree. I'll admit there could be confusion between a
"book" and a
book of the Bible (though I'm not sure about other books, since that is
recognising
that each "other book" is just a type of book). However, I'm sure that we have
anything much better. I don't think the word module should be used at all, and
have
never liked it as I don't think it has any real world meaning (and so I'm
curious to
see the word "module" in the standard issue template - must fix that).
Equally, I
don't think resource really describes what a thing is, whereas to me book makes
sense
and has a real world analogue. I could be wrong, though.
Original comment by jonmmor...@gmail.com
on 31 May 2010 at 11:42
You are right, book is the easierst word to understand especially for
non-English
native speakers like me.
So the word 'book' is used in a threefold sense in the program
- book for all, what can be loaded into the program, even if it is an article
or ...
- other book, loaded and not a Bible or commentary or dictionary or ...
- Bible book, one of the books of Bible (Genesis - Revelation)
As long as it is clear to the user, which kind of book is in focus, this is OK.
Original comment by wolfgang...@gmx.de
on 1 Jun 2010 at 10:32
Original comment by jonmmor...@gmail.com
on 3 Jun 2010 at 2:14
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
wolfgang...@gmx.de
on 31 May 2010 at 10:05