Include CRAN error/warning/note where relevant

[hturner]

For cases that produce an error/warning/note, such as Formatting Software Names, it would be good if we could include the message produced so that the cookbook may be discovered if people do a web search based on the message.

This does introduce a bit of a maintenance issue, as the message may change over time, but I think it will increase the usefulness of the cookbook.

[Baltmann01]

I started adding the standard response from CRAN team members for the last recipes (e.g.: the .GlobalEnv issue). When we are done with (most) recipes, I will go through and add them for the earlier recipes as well.

Errors/warnings/notes from the automated checks are not implemented yet. The problem there is that I don't really see them when doing CRAN work as the packages are rejected before they reach me. I suppose those issues are more likely detected by package authors of the community. @jasdumas and I are discussing good ways, how they can contribute. We will also talk a bit about this in our time meeting next week.

[llrs]

The other day was checking BiocChecks that implements the check for Bioconductor. They have a vignette with the messages it provides, this is very helpful for users/developers to see how to fix that ERROR/WARNING/NOTE. Although you don't see it won't be too difficult to collect them via tools::CRAN_check_details():

ccd <- tools::CRAN_check_details()
library("dplyr")
f <- ccd |> 
     as.data.frame() |> 
     filter(nzchar(Output)) |> 
     distinct(Check, Output) |> 
     arrange(Check, Output)

Which shows that currently there are 47 different checks failing (with different outputs). BTW, related to #55, the most common check message is about "installed package size" with one above 98Mb

[Baltmann01]

That's a great hint! I'll look into this and keep it in mind when adding some issues/NOTEs in the future. Thanks